hacked89
Full Access Member
Engine fired
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
On the T04Z truck, I’m running a catch can. It’s working, but I feel that it is unnecessary. That truck is decently capable, being fed with an R&D 130cc. It has 5000 miles on the build and 2500 mile change intervals is seeming about right so far. For that truck, it has a v band intake manifold which is nice because the factory CDR port is deleted and I feed the system back through the air intake tube. On the bronco, I used a factory intake and wanted to try no CDR which left the port, and figured I’d do a hybrid and run the valve covers to the factory port location. This is only because it’s NA. At one time, and I may have posted about it, I read that there was international documentation that when CDRs failed open it pulled towards the rear cylinders and was a cause of head gasket failures. I may have even speculated that in my past post history. At this point, I don’t think it’s an issue and may have been a rumor. Talk is cheap though and anything I suggest or say unless it’s disclaimed I put to the test on my own stuff. The bronco engine is testing that. Lastly, I want a version that works well for both NA and turbo. i think IDIot and R&D have the right idea to pursue it off the IP cover. That’s what I’ll tinker with next. Im going to be working on TIG skills this fall / winter because I have some current and future projects that will need it.@hacked89 i watched your 7/1 video you posted. You talked about how you did the CDR modification, but not the why.
I assume it’s an experiment to not have a catch can. What are the shortcomings of the factory system? Is it the rear 2 cylinders getting fed all the vapors?
Thanks for your time.
Well, you'll just have to write it up like a Dickens novel........Thanks for asking - I finished this build but the forum doesn’t support the ability for me to post pictures anymore
Well, you'll just have to write it up like a Dickens novel........
It was a brisk spring day in Pennsylvania, the tulips had recently broke the surface of the ground and the sent of PB blaster, diesel fuel and rotten gas had begun to stir my emotions to drive a diesel powered bronco through the slush of the long forgotten snows.
Oh, this wasn't any diesel powered bronco, it was a '88 bricknose bronco. Something like a bullnose that had ran into a brick wall while it was trying to evolve into the 92-96 'OBS' front, slightly unconventional, but endearing because it's a Ford......
You get the idea, talk it up for us @hacked89 !!!
That's a fine K-11 Urban Assault Vehicle you have there sir!You must be registered for see images attach7.3, ZF5, KPD60, NP205, GM 14 bolt, 5.13s, front and rear selectable air lockers, psc hydro assist, prp interior, f350 wiring/dash, f350 tank, f350 receiver, 37s, ready to wheel
future - I need a pipe bender I want to make an exo, improve / fix lighting for wheeling. And it either has an injector tick (@Nero any videos of your injector saga of engine running I can hear?) Or an exhaust guide that’s loose (I did not have loose guides when I put the engine together but maybe)
Hasn’t been on the highway but it would probably be like driving an f-super / rollback from the genHow do you find 5.13 on the highway with that setup?
I've driven those, but 30-31" tires and a heavier truck.Hasn’t been on the highway but it would probably be like driving an f-super / rollback from the gen